Sophism in Action

Notice the style of debate. She consistantly misrepresents my position and never answers questions, but is always on the offensive.

Notice also that the burden of evidence changes several times, first from "make any argument" to "make an argument proving that God intervened in the evolutionary process" to "that only works if fine tuning is true, show fine tuning is true" to "how did you get the lottery statistic" to "how did you get the universal statistic" Notice at well I offer at several times to give sources, but she refuses sources! This is more special pleding, no academic book is written without quoting other sources, ever! This is just an exercise in sophism, nothing more or less.